The conflict between K-pop group NewJeans and their agency ADOR has escalated into a public dispute over the validity of their exclusive contract. NewJeans has declared their intent to terminate the contract, while ADOR insists the agreement remains legally binding.
On November 28, NewJeans held an emergency press conference in Gangnam, Seoul, announcing their decision to end their exclusive contract with ADOR effective at midnight on November 29. The group attributed the termination to ADOR’s alleged mismanagement, claiming they bear no responsibility for the anticipated breach penalties. Furthermore, NewJeans stated their intention to continue using the group’s name and voiced strong support for former CEO Min Hee Jin, expressing a desire to work with her in the future.
In response, ADOR released an official statement the same day, expressing regret over the group’s announcement. “We are disappointed that NewJeans chose to hold a press conference before awaiting our response to their certified notice. ADOR has not violated the contract terms, and a unilateral claim of lost trust does not justify termination,” the agency said. They emphasized that the contract remains valid and requested cooperation for ongoing schedules.
The issue traces back to November 13, when NewJeans sent a formal notice to ADOR, raising grievances and hinting at potential contract termination. Among their demands were a public apology from a manager, the removal of unauthorized images and videos, compensation for alleged damages from album mismanagement, and the reinstatement of Min Hee Jin.
ADOR acknowledged receipt of the notice on November 14, stating their intent to address the concerns constructively. However, the abrupt press conference has led to criticism that NewJeans acted prematurely and emotionally, rather than presenting substantial legal grounds or evidence for their claims.
Industry observers are closely monitoring the case, which highlights the complexities of artist-agency relationships in K-pop. Legal experts note that the dispute may hinge on whether NewJeans can substantiate their claims of contract violations and damages.
This situation sheds light on the fragility of artist-management dynamics in an industry where creative tensions and public scrutiny often intersect. As the conflict unfolds, its resolution could set a significant precedent for the future of artist-agency contracts in the entertainment sector.
Sayart / Kelly.K, pittou8181@gmail.com
Courtesy of Ador
The conflict between K-pop group NewJeans and their agency ADOR has escalated into a public dispute over the validity of their exclusive contract. NewJeans has declared their intent to terminate the contract, while ADOR insists the agreement remains legally binding.
On November 28, NewJeans held an emergency press conference in Gangnam, Seoul, announcing their decision to end their exclusive contract with ADOR effective at midnight on November 29. The group attributed the termination to ADOR’s alleged mismanagement, claiming they bear no responsibility for the anticipated breach penalties. Furthermore, NewJeans stated their intention to continue using the group’s name and voiced strong support for former CEO Min Hee Jin, expressing a desire to work with her in the future.
In response, ADOR released an official statement the same day, expressing regret over the group’s announcement. “We are disappointed that NewJeans chose to hold a press conference before awaiting our response to their certified notice. ADOR has not violated the contract terms, and a unilateral claim of lost trust does not justify termination,” the agency said. They emphasized that the contract remains valid and requested cooperation for ongoing schedules.
The issue traces back to November 13, when NewJeans sent a formal notice to ADOR, raising grievances and hinting at potential contract termination. Among their demands were a public apology from a manager, the removal of unauthorized images and videos, compensation for alleged damages from album mismanagement, and the reinstatement of Min Hee Jin.
ADOR acknowledged receipt of the notice on November 14, stating their intent to address the concerns constructively. However, the abrupt press conference has led to criticism that NewJeans acted prematurely and emotionally, rather than presenting substantial legal grounds or evidence for their claims.
Industry observers are closely monitoring the case, which highlights the complexities of artist-agency relationships in K-pop. Legal experts note that the dispute may hinge on whether NewJeans can substantiate their claims of contract violations and damages.
This situation sheds light on the fragility of artist-management dynamics in an industry where creative tensions and public scrutiny often intersect. As the conflict unfolds, its resolution could set a significant precedent for the future of artist-agency contracts in the entertainment sector.
