Sayart.net - GN Architects Transforms Industrial Site into Innovative Senior Living Community in Shanghai

  • September 06, 2025 (Sat)

GN Architects Transforms Industrial Site into Innovative Senior Living Community in Shanghai

Sayart / Published September 2, 2025 05:34 AM
  • -
  • +
  • print

A groundbreaking senior living development called Joyful Community has been completed in Shanghai's Fengxian District, representing a new approach to retirement community design that challenges traditional models. Designed by GN Architects and completed in 2022, the 270,000-square-meter project transforms a former industrial site into a vibrant mixed-use community that serves not only residents but the broader neighborhood.

Located in Fengcheng Town approximately 30 kilometers from downtown Shanghai, the development sits within what the architects describe as a typical Chinese "urban fringe landscape" surrounded by villages, farmlands, and extensive transportation networks. The site covers 120,000 square meters with a total floor area of approximately 200,000 square meters, originally serving as industrial land before being transformed under urban renewal initiatives into a mixed-use area for social welfare, medical, and cultural facilities.

Lead architect Guan Yiqun and the design team at GN Architects approached the project with the revolutionary concept of turning a retirement community into a "regional vitality center." This vision aimed to create not just housing for elderly residents, but a central hub that would attract and serve the entire surrounding community. The project reflects government support and policy responses to creating open, diversified communities that break down traditional barriers between private residential facilities and public spaces.

A significant conceptual shift occurred during the project's development when the operations team changed the name from "community" to "village" just before completion. This change resonated deeply with the architects, who saw it as a convergence of operational and design philosophies. From the conceptual design stage, they had proposed a "village-like" community approached from an urban planning perspective, pushing them to create richer public space forms, more open traffic arrangements, and flexible cluster divisions.

The architectural strategy employed what the designers call an "inside-out" approach, contrasting with traditional community facilities that are either "inward-facing" community centers or "outward-facing" urban public spaces. The facility areas are arranged in a horizontal "T" shape, extending toward the urban interface while penetrating into the community's interior. This layout maximizes both external and internal interfaces, attracting both urban citizens and community residents to gather in shared spaces.

This innovative arrangement had the additional effect of giving each residential cluster more publicity while maintaining independence. The architects envision a future state where management boundaries shrink to individual residential clusters, allowing the remaining spaces to be fully open to the public. The ongoing negotiation between "public" and "private" boundaries became a central theme throughout the project and will likely remain relevant as the community continues to evolve.

Connectivity throughout the complex was achieved through a sophisticated circulation system that liberates functional modules from traditional architectural "integrity." Whether in the centralized Sports Complex facing the city or the decentralized facilities deeper within the site, individual modules maintain relatively independent forms while directly facing public spaces such as plazas, alleys, and courtyards. This design intent creates places with their own distinct "addresses," offering potential for independent development in the future.

Three circular routes connect these various elements: the "Activity Loop" in the Sports Complex, the "Interest Loop" on the second floor of the decentralized facilities, and the "Exploration Loop" on the ground floor. These loops, each with varying spatial characteristics, serve not only as efficient transit paths but also as key spaces for activities and social interactions. The Sports Complex at the main entrance was specifically designed for urban engagement, hosting numerous cultural and sports functions through transparent glass corridors with large horizontal spans.

The 22 boxes comprising the Village Center are connected by second-floor glass corridors and balcony pathways, forming a continuous loop across the entire area. These same structures also feature a "covered corridor" created by second-floor slabs and bridges, weaving through various courtyards on the ground level. This multi-level circulation system ensures that residents and visitors can navigate the complex while discovering new spaces and viewpoints.

Recognizing that friendly and comfortable social activities are often "informal," the architects paid special attention to creating "in-between" spaces and edges where spontaneous interactions could occur. The decentralized facilities consist of a series of staggered and overlapping courtyards designed with precise scene control while leaving room for design "tolerance." This approach resulted in numerous delightful small spaces emerging throughout the site, including terraces at corners, skylights above, and courtyards beside pathways.

Many fascinating nooks and sightlines were discovered only after completion, creating what the architects hope will be a sense of spatial curiosity shared with future residents and visitors. These informal spaces acknowledge that meaningful social interactions often arise from wandering and idleness, varying with time and the people who inhabit them.

The project was designed with significant growth potential, incorporating "undefined" spaces that can adapt to changing needs and user preferences. The first floor of the decentralized facilities is scattered with flexible spaces, including 22 inward-facing studios and outward-facing glass boxes that could become flower shops, cafes, clubs, or salons. The over-four-meter-wide corridors of the Sports Complex are similarly undefined, initially conceived as extensions of adjacent functional spaces but now envisioned by the operations team as aerial galleries, fitness loops, and more.

Recent developments have validated the architects' vision of a community capable of achieving functional "renewal" through collective user participation. The operations team recently announced that a family farm on the north side of the project has opened, with plans to host Dunhuang and contemporary art exhibitions in the library. They are also encouraging artists to move into studios within the decentralized facilities, further blurring the lines between residential, cultural, and commercial functions.

The project represents a significant departure from conventional senior living design, challenging assumptions about age-segregated communities and demonstrating how thoughtful architecture can create intergenerational spaces that benefit entire neighborhoods. By transforming former industrial land into a vibrant mixed-use development, GN Architects has created a model that other developers and municipalities might consider as they address the growing needs of aging populations while revitalizing urban fringe areas.

A groundbreaking senior living development called Joyful Community has been completed in Shanghai's Fengxian District, representing a new approach to retirement community design that challenges traditional models. Designed by GN Architects and completed in 2022, the 270,000-square-meter project transforms a former industrial site into a vibrant mixed-use community that serves not only residents but the broader neighborhood.

Located in Fengcheng Town approximately 30 kilometers from downtown Shanghai, the development sits within what the architects describe as a typical Chinese "urban fringe landscape" surrounded by villages, farmlands, and extensive transportation networks. The site covers 120,000 square meters with a total floor area of approximately 200,000 square meters, originally serving as industrial land before being transformed under urban renewal initiatives into a mixed-use area for social welfare, medical, and cultural facilities.

Lead architect Guan Yiqun and the design team at GN Architects approached the project with the revolutionary concept of turning a retirement community into a "regional vitality center." This vision aimed to create not just housing for elderly residents, but a central hub that would attract and serve the entire surrounding community. The project reflects government support and policy responses to creating open, diversified communities that break down traditional barriers between private residential facilities and public spaces.

A significant conceptual shift occurred during the project's development when the operations team changed the name from "community" to "village" just before completion. This change resonated deeply with the architects, who saw it as a convergence of operational and design philosophies. From the conceptual design stage, they had proposed a "village-like" community approached from an urban planning perspective, pushing them to create richer public space forms, more open traffic arrangements, and flexible cluster divisions.

The architectural strategy employed what the designers call an "inside-out" approach, contrasting with traditional community facilities that are either "inward-facing" community centers or "outward-facing" urban public spaces. The facility areas are arranged in a horizontal "T" shape, extending toward the urban interface while penetrating into the community's interior. This layout maximizes both external and internal interfaces, attracting both urban citizens and community residents to gather in shared spaces.

This innovative arrangement had the additional effect of giving each residential cluster more publicity while maintaining independence. The architects envision a future state where management boundaries shrink to individual residential clusters, allowing the remaining spaces to be fully open to the public. The ongoing negotiation between "public" and "private" boundaries became a central theme throughout the project and will likely remain relevant as the community continues to evolve.

Connectivity throughout the complex was achieved through a sophisticated circulation system that liberates functional modules from traditional architectural "integrity." Whether in the centralized Sports Complex facing the city or the decentralized facilities deeper within the site, individual modules maintain relatively independent forms while directly facing public spaces such as plazas, alleys, and courtyards. This design intent creates places with their own distinct "addresses," offering potential for independent development in the future.

Three circular routes connect these various elements: the "Activity Loop" in the Sports Complex, the "Interest Loop" on the second floor of the decentralized facilities, and the "Exploration Loop" on the ground floor. These loops, each with varying spatial characteristics, serve not only as efficient transit paths but also as key spaces for activities and social interactions. The Sports Complex at the main entrance was specifically designed for urban engagement, hosting numerous cultural and sports functions through transparent glass corridors with large horizontal spans.

The 22 boxes comprising the Village Center are connected by second-floor glass corridors and balcony pathways, forming a continuous loop across the entire area. These same structures also feature a "covered corridor" created by second-floor slabs and bridges, weaving through various courtyards on the ground level. This multi-level circulation system ensures that residents and visitors can navigate the complex while discovering new spaces and viewpoints.

Recognizing that friendly and comfortable social activities are often "informal," the architects paid special attention to creating "in-between" spaces and edges where spontaneous interactions could occur. The decentralized facilities consist of a series of staggered and overlapping courtyards designed with precise scene control while leaving room for design "tolerance." This approach resulted in numerous delightful small spaces emerging throughout the site, including terraces at corners, skylights above, and courtyards beside pathways.

Many fascinating nooks and sightlines were discovered only after completion, creating what the architects hope will be a sense of spatial curiosity shared with future residents and visitors. These informal spaces acknowledge that meaningful social interactions often arise from wandering and idleness, varying with time and the people who inhabit them.

The project was designed with significant growth potential, incorporating "undefined" spaces that can adapt to changing needs and user preferences. The first floor of the decentralized facilities is scattered with flexible spaces, including 22 inward-facing studios and outward-facing glass boxes that could become flower shops, cafes, clubs, or salons. The over-four-meter-wide corridors of the Sports Complex are similarly undefined, initially conceived as extensions of adjacent functional spaces but now envisioned by the operations team as aerial galleries, fitness loops, and more.

Recent developments have validated the architects' vision of a community capable of achieving functional "renewal" through collective user participation. The operations team recently announced that a family farm on the north side of the project has opened, with plans to host Dunhuang and contemporary art exhibitions in the library. They are also encouraging artists to move into studios within the decentralized facilities, further blurring the lines between residential, cultural, and commercial functions.

The project represents a significant departure from conventional senior living design, challenging assumptions about age-segregated communities and demonstrating how thoughtful architecture can create intergenerational spaces that benefit entire neighborhoods. By transforming former industrial land into a vibrant mixed-use development, GN Architects has created a model that other developers and municipalities might consider as they address the growing needs of aging populations while revitalizing urban fringe areas.

WEEKLY HOTISSUE